Skip to content
Audit what exists

Which parts would actually hurt you?

Not a generic checklist scored out of a hundred. A focused look at the specific places where your product would cost you money, customers or time.

What this covers

The four things worth auditing first

Architecture

Whether the shape of the system can carry what you plan to do next, and what would have to change if it cannot.

Data

Schema, integrity, migrations and backups. The area where a mistake is least reversible and most often unnoticed.

Security

A technical review of authentication, authorization, secrets and exposure. Not a compliance certificate, and never presented as one.

The unreviewed half

Where generated code concentrated, what has no tests, and what nobody on your side can explain.

How it goes

Findings with evidence, ranked by what to do first

  1. We agree what is worth looking at

    Auditing everything at once produces a document nobody acts on. We pick the areas where a finding would change a decision.

  2. Inspection happens before any change

    Reading and changing are separate steps. Mixing them is how an audit quietly becomes an unplanned refactor.

  3. Every finding carries its evidence

    A file, a line, a query, a log. A claim without something to point at does not make the list.

  4. You get an order, not a pile

    What to fix now, what to fix before the next release, and what to accept and stop worrying about.

When this is worth doing

Probably not the right move if

You need a signed compliance certification

You want a number out of a hundred to put in a deck

Nobody is available to act on the findings

Worth doing if

You are about to take on real users or real money

Something already failed and you do not know how widely

A buyer, partner or investor is going to look at it

You suspect the fast part of the build skipped the careful part

Start with the area that worries you most

Pick the level of involvement that fits, describe your product, and we begin there.